Background
On April 30, 2025, the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) of Australia ruled in favor of Alcoa of Australia Ltd. in a dispute with the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) regarding Transfer Pricing. The dispute concerned alumina sales to a refinery in Bahrain between 1993 and 2009, where the ATO alleged that Alcoa had failed to apply market prices in its related party transactions due to the alumina under-invoicing of Alcoa by more than USD 420 million, which resulted in a tax shortfall exceeding AUD 213 million.
Tribunal Decision
The ART concluded that the ATO’s assessments were excessive and that Alcoa did not owe additional taxes. The tribunal highlighted the importance of applying the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method and the need for contextualized economic analysis and expert evidence in Transfer Pricing disputes.
Financial Implications
Due to the decision, Alcoa expects a refund of approximately $67 million in June 2025. Conversely, it must also pay about $216 million in taxes related to interest deductions by June 1, 2026. The net cash impact over the next fourteen months is estimated at $149 million.
Relevance to Multinational Corporations
This case emphasizes solid documentation and detailed economic analysis in Transfer Pricing policies. Companies should ensure that their related party transactions are conducted at market value and supported by appropriate technical studies to avoid tax disputes.
Specialized TPC Group Advice
At TPC Group, we provide specialized Transfer Pricing advice, assisting companies to comply with international tax regulations and mitigate associated risks. Our team of experts is prepared to assist in preparing Transfer Pricing studies and defending before tax authorities.
📩 Contact us today for customized advice and ensure your company’s tax compliance.
Source: MinterEllison