Canada Strengthens Taxation in Transparency Pricing

February 26, 2025

Rigorous Approach of the Canada Revenue Agency

Canada has become an attractive destination for multinationals due to its economic prosperity, highly skilled workforce, regulatory stability, and strong financial system. Conversely, this attractiveness comes with strict Transfer Pricing supervision by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The CRA is recognized for its aggressive approach to applying Transfer Pricing rules, frequently challenging related party transactions, and allocating cross-border profits. In addition, it imposes documentation requirements exceeding the OECD guidelines and performs exhaustive audits that can result in large disputes, significant adjustments, and severe penalties. 

Arm’s Length Principle in Canadian Law

The Transfer Pricing framework in Canada, outlined in Section 247 of the Income Tax Act (ITA), is based on the Arm’s Length Principle. This principle requires that cross-border related party transactions be valued as those of independent entities in market conditions. Otherwise, the CRA expects adjustments, either proactively by the taxpayer or through an audit. Although the CRA provides “detailed guidance” on applying this principle, it is relentless in examining transactions and applying adjustments where necessary. 

Strict Documentation Requirements

The CRA requires taxpayers to maintain contemporaneous documentation, which means that the Transfer Pricing report must be ready by the tax return filing deadline, generally six months after the close of the fiscal year (June 30). For audits, only 90 days are available to report it; otherwise, it would incur automatic non-compliance and possible penalties. In addition, the CRA prioritizes substance over form in functional analyses and agreements among related companies, expecting records that reflect the economic operating reality beyond mere formal compliance. 

Comparison with the OECD Guidelines

While the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) guidelines and the Canadian requirements share similarities, there are key differences: 

  • Functional analysis: While BEPS requires a functional analysis to monitor the value creation in the supply chain, Canada goes deeper, focusing on who assumes risks, who controls them, and who has decision-making power. 
  • Transfer Pricing Methods: Although Canada does not mandate employing a specific method, the CRA generally prefers traditional transaction-based methods, such as Comparable Uncontrolled Pricing (CUP), over profit-based methods. 
  • Benchmarking and comparables: The CRA requires current-year comparables, in contrast to multi-year averages, and prefers local comparables. In addition, it avoids employing statistical tools, such as interquartile ranges, opting instead to consider the full range of outcomes. 

Non-compliance Consequences

Failure to comply with Transfer Pricing rules in Canada can carry significant penalties. The CRA can reclassify or adjust transactions that lack economic substance or are inconsistent with the Arm’s Length Principle. These adjustments can lead to double taxation, as other jurisdictions may not recognize the CRA’s changes, forcing taxpayers to face lengthy and costly disputes. 

Recommendations for Multinational Enterprises

In order to mitigate Transfer Pricing risks in Canada, multinational companies should have the following: 

  • Proactive preparation: Detailed and current documentation supporting the Transfer Pricing policies adopted. 
  • Comprehensive functional analysis: Analysis reflecting the economic reality of transactions and demonstrating the control and assumption of risks by the entities involved. 
  • Specialized advice: International tax experts versed in the particularities of Canadian Transfer Pricing legislation. 

Conclusion

The CRA applies a rigorous approach to Transfer Pricing oversight, requiring multinational companies to be thoroughly prepared and strictly compliant with the regulations. A proactive strategy and a thorough understanding of the Canadian regulatory environment are essential to avoid penalties and optimize the company’s tax position. 

 

Source: Exactera

Contact Us

In order to contact us, please fill out the following form: