In international taxation, related-party transactions involving intangible assets-such as technologies, patents, trademarks, or know-how-represent one of the most complex challenges for Transfer Pricing. Under the Arm’s Length Principle established by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), royalty payments must reflect the compensation that independent parties would have agreed upon in comparable circumstances, which requires a rigorous analysis of the functions, assets, and risks involved in the exploitation of these intangibles.
Definition and Scope of Intangibles in Transfer Pricing
The OECD considers intangible any non-physical or non-financial asset that can be owned or controlled for use in commercial activities and whose use or transfer would be subject to compensation among independent parties, which includes intellectual property rights, trademarks, trade secrets, formulas, technical processes, specialized software, and other intangible elements that generate economic value.
It should be noted that, although some tax systems may classify a “payment for the use of intangible property” as a royalty for double taxation agreements, the independent technical analysis of the treatment under the articles of a tax agreement must be applied for Transfer Pricing purposes. The OECD emphasizes that the concepts of “royalty” for tax treaties and “intangibles” for Transfer Pricing are distinct and should not be confused.
Arm’s Length Principle and Royalty Determination
The Arm’s Length Principle requires that any related-party transaction be valued as if it were between independent parties under comparable conditions. For royalty payments, it entails estimating the level of compensation to be paid for the license to use or exploit intangibles in comparable transactions in the current market.
This analysis requires:
- Accurate identification of the intangible: The specific asset under transaction must be characterized, distinguishing between internally developed and externally acquired intangibles.
- Determination of functions, assets, and risks: Evaluation of the economic contributions of the related parties in the development, maintenance, protection, and exploitation of the intangible. This approach, known as DEMPE (Development, Enhancement, Maintenance, Protection, and Exploitation) analysis, is crucial for determining who assumes the risks and contributes significant economic value to the intangible involved in the transaction.
- Selection of the Transfer Pricing Method: Selection of the methodology that best reflects the Arm’s Length Principle in accordance with the OECD Guidelines. Although various methods can be applied to intangible transactions, including those based on price comparables, profits, or specific techniques like relief from royalties, the OECD acknowledges that no single method is suitable for every case, which should be tailored to the unique facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction.
Applicable Methods and Practical Considerations
Methods frequently used in royalty and intangible asset transactions include:
- Relief from Royalty Method: estimates the value of the license by comparing it to implicit royalties that a third party would pay for the use of a similar intangible.
- The Transactional Net Margin or Profit Split Method assesses the distribution of profits among related parties, especially in complex transactions where direct comparables are scarce.
- Discounted Cash Flow or Residual Income Analysis Methods are used when the intangibles are unique, and there are no direct external comparables.
The selection of the method must be technically supported and documented in the Transfer Pricing report, based on the reliability of data and the level of comparability achieved.
Challenges in Intangible and Royalty Transactions
One of the principal challenges in valuing royalties and using intangibles is the scarcity of independent comparables, due to the unique nature of many intangible assets. Consequently, tax authorities may question analyses based on unreliable comparables or unverifiable assumptions. The OECD offers guidelines for addressing these challenges, emphasizing in-depth economic analysis over mere accounting or legal definitions of assets.
In addition, tax authorities in many countries have intensified their scrutiny of intangible asset transactions, considering them a means of base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). In this context, proper documentation of functions, risks, and compensation associated with intangibles is crucial to mitigate tax adjustments and contingencies.
Documentation and Compliance Requirements
To meet the expectations of tax authorities and mitigate adjustment risks, taxpayers should:
- Thoroughly document the technical and economic analysis supporting the setting of royalties.
- Include comparative analyses, an explanation of the methodological selection, and evidence of the level of comparability achieved.
- Align the analysis with the guidelines in Chapter VI of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, which specifically address intangible transactions.
Conclusion
Transactions related to the payment of royalties for the use of intangibles are one of the most sensitive and closely monitored areas of Transfer Pricing. The OECD’s approach, particularly based on BEPS actions and DEMPE analysis, has reinforced the need to align economic remuneration with the actual creation of value within business groups.
In this context, the correct identification of intangibles, the functional characterization of the parties involved, and the selection of technically sustainable methods are key elements in complying with the Arm’s Length Principle and reducing tax contingencies. Consistent and thorough documentation that adheres to international standards not only strengthens a taxpayer’s position before an audit but also promotes more efficient and predictable tax management.
Specialized Advice on Royalties and Intangibles
Intragroup transactions related to the use of intangibles and the payment of royalties require rigorous technical analysis and proper alignment with the OECD guidelines to minimize tax contingencies. TPC Group, as a specialized Transfer Pricing firm, advises domestic and multinational companies on the structuring, review, and documentation of these types of transactions, ensuring compliance with the Arm’s Length Principle and applicable tax regulations. A preventive approach identifies risks, optimizes royalty policies, and strengthens the taxpayer’s defense against potential tax audits.
Sources: