Renault Spain has paid 297 million euros to the Spanish Tax Agency—255 million in taxes plus 42 million in late-payment interest—to settle a tax dispute that lasted more than six years and centered on Transfer Pricing between its Spanish subsidiary and its parent company in Paris. Although the case is settled in terms of payment, the underlying dispute remains open: the company has requested two bilateral mutual agreement procedures between Spain and France to try to recover part of the amount paid.
The Technical Basis of the Dispute
The dispute centered on the prices at which Renault Spain sold its products to its parent company. According to audits by the Tax and Customs Control Unit covering the fiscal years 2013–2020, those prices did not reflect market value, which unduly reduced the tax base in Spain. The case was divided into three inspection periods: 2013–2015 (assessment notices of disagreement totaling 135.13 million euros), 2016 (77.95 million, with an appeal filed by the company), and 2017–2020 (assessment notice of agreement for just over 84 million).
This pattern—a combination of assessment notices issued in disagreement and those issued by mutual agreement, depending on the period—illustrates a technical aspect that is often underestimated: the level of support for an intercompany transaction can vary significantly between tax years, even within the same contractual relationship between a parent company and a subsidiary.
Double Taxation and the Mutual Agreement Procedure
Renault does not consider the dispute closed. Having paid taxes in Spain without France automatically recognizing that same income as already taxed, the company faces a risk of international double taxation. Consequently, it has initiated mutual agreement procedures (MAPs) with the tax authorities of both countries, a mechanism provided for in bilateral tax treaties to resolve such disputes without the need for litigation. These procedures, however, can drag on for years before a final resolution is reached.
A recurring pattern in the automotive sector
The Renault case is not an isolated one. Other multinationals in the automotive sector, such as Stellantis and Volkswagen, have faced similar Transfer Pricing disputes in various jurisdictions. The growing focus by the OECD and the European Commission on intra-group transactions suggests that this type of audit will remain a priority, particularly when subsidiaries operate in jurisdictions with lower effective tax rates than those of the parent company.
At TPC Group, we assist multinational groups with intercompany transactions between parent companies and subsidiaries in structuring and documenting their Transfer Pricing policies in accordance with the arm’s-length principle and the OECD Guidelines, helping them anticipate these types of contingencies before they escalate into long-term litigation like the Renault case.
Source: